College of Shari'ah

This document is an official annual report for the program PhD in Doctrine and Contemporary Sects At Qassim University, I am prepared according to the requirements of The Education and Training Evaluation Commission (The National Center for Academic Accreditation and Assessment “NCAAA”) for the academic year 1444 AH.

Overview of the document and its purpose

The document is the “Annual Program Report” (TPG-152), which aims to provide comprehensive and accurate monitoring of the academic program's performance over a one-year period.. The main goal is Self-assessment The program to ensure the quality of educational outcomes, measure the achievement of targeted learning outcomes, and identify challenges for developing a future improvement plan that ensures continued academic accreditation..

The most important themes covered in the report

The report's content is divided into several core themes, including:

1. Program Statistics: clarify that the total number of registered individuals reached 75 male and female students, with the completion of 15 students The program was successful during the reporting year.
2. Learning Outcomes Calendar: Measurement of cognitive and value skills, where the results recorded high performance levels reaching 95% In skills such as critical thinking, analysis, and commitment to academic integrity.
3. Research activity: The report monitored remarkable research achievements that included 40 published research papersand seminars and conferences, in addition to a breakdown of approved doctoral dissertations whose topics ranged from critiques of contemporary thought to religions and sects.
4. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Analysis 19 indicators Student satisfaction with course quality (4.45 out of 5), graduate employment rate, and faculty publication rate.
5. Development plan Focus on meeting academic accreditation requirements and developing new mechanisms for documenting scientific output.

Target audience

• University and College Administration: To follow up on the efficiency of the scientific department and to make supportive administrative decisions.
• The Education and Training Evaluation Commission: As a regulatory authority granting academic accreditation.
• Faculty and Scientific Committees: To develop curricula and update scientific references to keep pace with developments.
• Researchers and students: To provide a clear picture of the program's academic and research path.

The report concludes with its approval by the Council of the Department of Doctrine and Contemporary Sects at the beginning of the year 1445 AH, reflecting transparency and methodology in developing the educational process..