A simple icon, consisting of a series of links surrounded by a circle, is a common symbol for a connection or hyperlink. The lines of the icon are outlined in a dark black color on the background, with the addition of military elements of the Saudi national identity such as the Ghutra, Shamaa, and Saudi Bisht, to reflect the distinctive local character of Qassim University.
Links to official Saudi educational websites end with edu.sa
All links to official educational websites of government agencies in Saudi Arabia end with .edu.sa.
Black leather minimalist gesture tag, black circular grip, topped with a clear depiction of a Saudi tunic with a shamma and aqal, emphasizing the features of the Saudi bisht. This design symbolizes the concept of security and digital data privacy and reflects the identity of Qassim University.
protocol for encryption and security. HTTPS for encryption and security.
Secure websites in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia use the HTTPS protocol for encryption.
Digital Government Authority

Colleges

Studies in Disagreement and Principles of Preponderance

Course Description: This course addresses the scientific foundation and practical application of interpretation rules, rules for weighting differing scholarly opinions on interpretation, explains the causes of disagreement among exegetes, and distinguishes between the types of disagreement.
Credits: 2
Objectives of the course :

That the researcher employs what they learned from the rules of weighting in dealing with differences, and possesses skills in dealing with interpretive sayings and inferring opinions.

Course outputs :

Knowledge and understanding:
To accurately explain the methods of collection and the rules for prioritizing interpretations of Quranic scholars.
To clarify the reasons for disagreement in interpretation, its types, and how to deal with it.
Skills:
To apply research methods and advanced skills in writing research on differences and reconciliation rules.
To compare interpretive sayings, using the rules of weighting them.
To evaluate the methodologies of interpreters and their methods of interpretation by applying the rules of weighing evidence.
Values, autonomy and responsibility:
To practice teamwork and team leadership effectively and positively.
To adhere to the etiquette of dialogue, the ethics of a researcher, and scientific integrity in his/her research.
To issue fair and sound rulings and decisions, based on knowledge, and founded on firm principles.

Additional information:

Course Topics:
Part One: Theoretical
• The principles on which interpretation is based:
Interpretation of the literal meaning.
B - Interpretation according to meaning.
Explanation by reference.
Differences among interpreters
a- Its types and the attitude towards them.
B. Its causes and effects.
- The most important works in it.
Rules of Interpretation
A. General Rules of Interpretation: Definition, Importance, Types, Sources.
B- Rules of Preference: Definition, Importance, Sources.
- The difference between interpretive, preferential, and usul rules.
• Types of preference rules:
– Rules concerning generalizations
– Rules relating to the Quranic context.
– Drawing rules.
– Rules related to readings.
– Rules related to the Sunnah and traditions.
– Rules concerning the Arabic language.
– Rules concerning presumptions.
– Rules related to grammar.
Rules concerning word conjugation.
Rules concerning the introduction and delay.
– Rules relating to the outward appearance of the Quran.
– Rules relating to establishment and confirmation.
– Rules related to pronouns.
– Rules concerning appraisal and non-appraisal.
Section Two: Applied.
Applications of Previous Weighting Rules Through Surat Al-Baqarah.

Cookies

This website uses special cookies to ensure ease of use, improve your browsing experience, and clarify the terms and policies related to About user privacy. By continuing to browse this website, you acknowledge that you accept the use of cookies and the terms of the Privacy Policy