A simple icon, consisting of a series of links surrounded by a circle, is a common symbol for a connection or hyperlink. The lines of the icon are outlined in a dark black color on the background, with the addition of military elements of the Saudi national identity such as the Ghutra, Shamaa, and Saudi Bisht, to reflect the distinctive local character of Qassim University.
Links to official Saudi educational websites end with edu.sa
All links to official educational websites of government agencies in Saudi Arabia end with .edu.sa.
Black leather minimalist gesture tag, black circular grip, topped with a clear depiction of a Saudi tunic with a shamma and aqal, emphasizing the features of the Saudi bisht. This design symbolizes the concept of security and digital data privacy and reflects the identity of Qassim University.
protocol for encryption and security. HTTPS for encryption and security.
Secure websites in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia use the HTTPS protocol for encryption.
Digital Government Authority

Colleges

Methods of reasoning

Course Description: This course covers inference and its types, methods of reaching Islamic legal rulings through linguistic and rational inference, inference using purposeful evidence, incidental, supplementary, or prioritizing evidence, and inference using general and specific evidence.
Credits: 2
Objectives of the course :

The course aims to introduce the student to inference and its types, how to infer using teleological, linguistic, and rational evidence for legal rulings, how to benefit from corroborating and supporting evidence in inferring rulings and weighting differing opinions, and to balance between general and specific evidence in case of conflict.

Course outputs :

Knowledge and understanding:
1. The student will identify and describe reasoning and its types in depth.
2. The student should thoroughly review the methods of inference using linguistic, rational, purposive, and corroborative evidence.
3. The student should explain the methods of objecting to evidence and discuss them soundly and in depth.
Skills:
To discuss the methodology of inferring with Sharia evidence and how to research it.
2. The student employs evidence to derive rulings and weigh different scholarly opinions.
3. The student accurately compares total evidence and partial evidence when there is a conflict.
4- The student will deduce how the fundamental principles of Islamic jurisprudence function within the Sharia evidence.
Values, autonomy and responsibility:
To be respectful of the sayings of scholars and those among his teachers and colleagues who share their views.
2. Argue with opponents positively.
3. The ability to take responsibility and be honest when presenting and critiquing the statements of others.

Additional information:

Course Topics:
First: Reasoning:
1 – The Reality of Inference
2 – Types of Evidence According to Usul al-Fiqh Scholars
Secondly: Inferring from the purposeful evidence:
1 – Reasoning by Public Interest
2- Inferring by blocking and opening means (i.e., prohibitions and permissions)
3- Taking into account differences of opinion.
4 - Reasoning by Istihsan
5 – Inference by Custom
6 – Inferring from Consequences
Third: Linguistic Inference
1 – Inference of the linguistic situation
2 – Reasoning by Context and Clues
3. Reasoning by the Linguistic Custom of the Street
4. Inferring grammatical meanings (particles, verbs, circumstantial clauses, exception, dependencies, morphological meaning, derivation, synonymy, etc.)
Fourth: Reasoning with intellectual evidence:
1. The reality of the intellect, its status, and its relationship to religious texts
2 - Logical Analogy Reasoning
3- Inferring from the primary evidence
4 – Reasoning by implication
5 - Proof by Excision and Division
6 - Reasoning by Certainty and Conjecture
7 – Inference by Istishab
Fifthly: Inferring with corroborative, supporting, or decisive evidence:
1 – Reasoning by caution
2 - Seeking Guidance from the Heart
3 – Reasoning by quoting the Majority
4 - Reasoning by Maqasid al-Shari'ah (Islamic Legal Objectives)
6 - Reasoning by Juristic Maxims
7 - Reasoning by taking the least that is said
8 – Inductive Reasoning
Sixth: Inferring from general and specific evidence:
1 – What is meant by general evidence and specific evidence
2 – Rules for Considering General Evidence in Conflict with Specific Evidence
3 - Applications for the conflict between general and specific evidence

Cookies

This website uses special cookies to ensure ease of use, improve your browsing experience, and clarify the terms and policies related to About user privacy. By continuing to browse this website, you acknowledge that you accept the use of cookies and the terms of the Privacy Policy